Hot Take 🔥🔥🔥: This isn’t some relic of the past. Negative SEO is alive, vicious, and ready to wreck your rankings when you least expect it.
You’d think that by 2025 — after countless algorithm updates and link spam crackdowns — negative SEO would be a ghost story. But no. It’s still very real. Case in point: one SEO firm ran an experiment where they spent just $40 on spam backlinks targeting their own site — and watched the wreckage.
Here’s what that $40 bought:
- 45,000 comment links — $15
- 7,000 double-tiered forum profile links (exact-match anchors) — $5
- 4,000 sidebar links — $20
All blatantly spammy, all designed to trip Google’s penalties. And when the final wave hit? The site tanked. Data like this is why nobody should say negative SEO is dead — especially when there’s a public reel documenting this kind of attack. (See it here.)
Phase 1: The Comment Spam Entrance
Hot Take 🔥: Spam comment links are the blunt hammer. They won’t kill you — at first. They flirt.
When those 45,000 comment links landed, the site didn’t collapse. It actually saw a small bump. Why? Because Google often won’t react instantly to obvious signals. The ambiguity buys time.
But this is just the opening gambit. It’s the baseline damage. Strong enough to rattle, weak enough to avoid instant collapse.
Phase 2: The Forum Profile Spam
Hot Take 🔥🔥: Layer your spam and watch the wobble begin.
Next, 7,000 double-tiered forum profile links — all with exact-match anchor text. This is more aggressive. This is the layer where the algorithm starts asking suspicious questions. The site didn’t crash yet, but the cracks began to show.
Now the defenders begin to worry: Are these legitimate? Should we respond? Should we disavow? That tension is exactly what the attacker wants.
Phase 3: The Sidebar Blow
Hot Take 🔥🔥🔥: That last wave is what seals the tomb.
Sidebar links — the cheap, lazy kind. But when you drop 4,000 of them after the earlier waves? That’s the knockout. The moment they hit, the site’s ranking fell straight down. No fade, no gradual decline — just a hard drop.
That’s negative SEO’s uppercut. Brutal, nasty, and devastating.
Objection: “But Negative SEO Isn’t Supposed to Work Anymore”
Hot Take 🔥🔥: That’s wishful thinking. The naysayers are asleep at the wheel.
Too many people believe that spammy links are simply ignored by Google. They lean on “algorithmic immunity” as a shield. But here’s the counter:
- SEOs I know have lost clients overnight due to mysterious drops traced to malicious link attacks.
- Businesses have destroyed months or years of SEO momentum trying to recover from negative campaigns.
- Agencies have quietly changed client sites after being hit with backlink hell, never publishing the carnage.
That $40 experiment, backed up by visible evidence (like the linked reel), is exactly the counterargument we need.
How to Brace Yourself (Without Losing Sleep)
Hot Take 🔥: Defense is messy. But it’s better than lying in wait.
- Set backlink alerts.
Get notified the moment your link profile spikes. Early detection is your only shot. - Audit steely and act fast.
Use tools like GSC, Ahrefs, SEMrush. Once you detect unnatural patterns — especially heavy exact-match anchors — prepare a disavow file pronto. - Diversify your link profile.
Strong, relevant, varied links help your site weather attacks. - Document everything.
When (not if) you’re attacked, log timestamps, backlink drops, ranking charts. This becomes your evidence in recovery. - Don’t lean on “algorithm immunity.”
Google’s systems are smart — but not invincible. A coordinated campaign can slip through.
Final Verdict: Negative SEO Is Still a Weapon
Hot Take 🔥🔥🔥: Don’t ignore it. Don’t dismiss it. Treat it as an arsonist’s torch in the dark — rare, hard to see, and devastating if it lands.
The SEO world preaches optimism: “Create quality content, earn real links, don’t worry about penalties.” All true—until someone starts bombing your site with malicious links overnight. That $40 experiment is your warning signal.
About the Author
